I wouldn t exactly call recent revelations, bombshells, as most of the theories have been around for years now, however, recent media attention, in part due to clever marketing tactics by PrisonPlanet, as well as Infowars, has brought some of these issues back to the forefront. Both sites bring up very good points as usual, however, they also use a lot of theorizing, and use of facts, possibly taken out of context, to come to their own conclusions about things.
For example, they use the instance where Barry Mawn, the director of the FBI's New York Office during the 9/11 events, asked a firefighter shortly after the South tower had collapsed, That tower got a secondary hit? Shortly after, another FBI agent asks Mawn, is that ours? Infowars seems to try and claim that Mawn was somehow trying to confirm with the fire department that a secondary hit had occurred on the South tower, and soon after, a fellow FBI agent tries to confirm with Mawn that their bomb had gone off, leading to the collapse of the South Tower.
Clearly the above scenario could have been what was taking place, however, so could have thousands of other possible scenarios which would not point towards a conspiracy or cover up.
While I think questioning things and looking deeper into them is always a good idea, taking a situation, which none of us really know the context in which it was occurring, and sermizing that each official meant a certain thing, is not really all that healthy. Perhaps there is more involved in the 9/11 attacks, perhaps even an FBI cover up, however, the short video clip that has been brought to light, does very little to confirm or deny such claims.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar